Russia now wants Apple to hand over user messages on demand

Roskomnadzor has added Apple to a registry that obliges the company to store Russian users' communications locally and surrender them to security services when asked.

AppleThreat Staff
2 Min Read

Russia has placed Apple on a registry that obliges it to keep users’ messages inside the country and hand them to security services on request. The listing is two months old, but the practical consequences are only now being understood.

Roskomnadzor, the communications regulator, added Apple and Microsoft on October 2 as “organizers of information dissemination.”

Three jobs the designation creates

Companies on the list must retain local users’ correspondence together with audio and video messages. They must also hold, for three years and on Russian soil, records that name each user and log when their traffic moved. Refusal carries fines, and eventually restrictions on the service itself.

Moscow has spent the year tightening the circle around outside messaging: WhatsApp and Telegram calls are limited, and Signal and Viber are blocked outright.

Apple halted direct sales in Russia in March 2022 after the invasion of Ukraine. It kept the App Store running, which has kept it in front of regulators. Payment restrictions later stopped Russian accounts from making new purchases or renewing subscriptions without a balance.

The company has also been pulled into enforcement actions. In August Russia’s antitrust regulator opened a case over Apple’s failure to preinstall the state-backed MAX messenger and the RuStore marketplace.

No answer and no obvious clean exit

Neither Apple nor Microsoft has said whether it will comply. Compliance would mean rebuilding Russian storage and disclosure capacity the company dismantled four years ago. Refusal means exposure to fines and, in the regulator’s playbook, losing what little remains.

The registry is a legal instrument, not a technical one, but it lands on the same ground as Apple’s device encryption. Every country that asks for the same treatment makes the precedent easier to cite.

Share This Article